Phantasia In Aristotle's Ethics: Reception In The Medieval Arabic, Greek, Hebrew And Latin Traditions (bloomsbury Studies In The Aristotelian Tradition)

Phantasia In Aristotle's Ethics: Reception In The Medieval Arabic, Greek, Hebrew And Latin Traditions (bloomsbury Studies In The Aristotelian Tradition)
by Jakob Leth Fink / / / PDF


Read Online 6.7 MB Download


When accounting for phronesis in the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle makes the claim that the principle does not immediately appear to the man who has been corrupted by pleasure or pain. While contemporary commentators on the Ethics have virtually nothing to say about this, Aristotles medieval interpreters in the Arabic, Greek, Hebrew and Latin traditions made substantial contributions towards a clarification of the claims meaning and relevance. Phantasia in Aristotle's Ethics investigates both Aristotles claim itself and its reception in various medieval Aristotelian traditions. Even when the hazards of transmission have left no explicit comments on this particular passage, as is the case in the Arabic tradition, Aristotles commentators still offer valuable interpretations of phantasia (representation) and its role in deliberation and action. This volume casts light on these readings, showing how the distant voices from the medieval Arabic, Greek, Hebrew and Latin Aristotelian traditions still contribute substantially to contemporary debate concerning phantasia, motivation and deliberation in Aristotles Ethics.

views: 347